Quiet firing, also known as silent firing, is a subtle, often unspoken management tactic where a boss may push an employee out of their role without explicitly firing them. Instead of direct communication or formal steps, this approach involves gradually creating a work environment that feels unsupportive, isolating, or even impossible to thrive in. Over time, these actions can feel like a clear message: “It’s time to move on.”
In this article, we’ll explore the meaning of quiet firing, common mistakes that lead to it, reasons it happens, and why it’s generally an unwise management strategy. Most importantly, we’ll discuss how to avoid quiet firing as a boss and, instead, how to foster a supportive, growth-oriented workplace.
What is quiet firing? Meaning
Quiet firing is a term used to describe employers intentionally creating conditions that make an employee want to quit, rather than addressing issues directly or terminating them outright. It’s a slow, indirect process that lacks transparency.
“Quiet firing often includes cutting employees out of new opportunities, raises, or promotions until they quit in frustration at their lack of career progress,” says Ben Michael, attorney at M & A Criminal Defense Attorneys. “In some instances, it can look like employers making the workplace a bit more hostile for an employee.”
Common quiet firing examples might include excluding employees from meaningful projects or meetings, gradually reducing their responsibilities and engagement with the team, or simply making day-to-day work feel less rewarding or more challenging.
A 2022 Harvard Business Review study, which surveyed over 1,000 American workers across various industries about their experiences with quiet firing, identified other tactics employers might use to “motivate” workers to leave. These included cutting payments, withholding bonuses, and limiting opportunities for extra work or overtime—actions that can make employees feel undervalued, overlooked, or unwelcome.
Quiet firing vs. quiet quitting
Quiet firing is often discussed alongside quiet quitting, but these terms describe different responses within the workplace. While quiet firing is an employer’s tactic to push an employee out, quiet quitting is when an employee consciously disengages, meeting only minimum job requirements.
The connection between the two can create a cycle of disengagement; if an employee senses they’re being sidelined, they might start “quiet quitting,” which can then be used by employers to justify the quiet firing approach.
Ultimately, both practices signal a lack of open communication and hinder a positive workplace environment, reducing morale and negatively impacting productivity and team dynamics.
Why managers engage in quiet firing
There are several reasons quiet firing may seem appealing to some managers. “Employers might do this to get out of paying unemployment benefits, or sometimes they simply don’t want to deal with the confrontation,” Michael says. Let’s look at some of these motives up close.
- Fear of confrontation: Addressing underperformance directly requires tough conversations that some managers would rather avoid. Instead of offering constructive feedback, they may choose quiet firing as a path of least resistance, hoping employees will leave on their own.
- Desire to avoid legal risks: Some managers believe quiet firing carries fewer risks than formal termination, viewing it as a way to avoid potential wrongful termination claims or costly legal proceedings. By making employees feel unwelcome rather than taking formal action, they hope to bypass these issues entirely.
- Inertia in management: In some cases, management may simply neglect to take action, allowing performance issues to go unaddressed. This passivity can lead to a quiet firing environment, where employees aren’t outright dismissed but are slowly sidelined until they feel compelled to resign.
Why quiet firing isn’t advisable
“Is quiet firing illegal?” The answer isn’t straightforward. “Legally, quiet firing exists in a gray area,” says attorney Ramzy Ladah. “In the U.S., most employment is ‘at-will,’ meaning employers can fire workers for any reason or no reason, as long as it’s not discriminatory or retaliatory.” When quiet firing enters this territory, it becomes more than a difficult work environment—it may open the door to potential legal claims.
Risk of legal action
In situations where quiet firing is applied unevenly or targets individuals from protected groups, companies could face legal repercussions. “If these actions specifically target someone based on protected characteristics—like race, gender, or disability—or if they come after an employee reported wrongdoing—whistleblowing—it might be a case of constructive dismissal or workplace harassment, crossing into illegal territory,” Ladah says.
Consequences for team dynamics
Engaging in quiet firing can have unintended consequences that extend far beyond a single employee's departure, sending waves through the team. When employees see a colleague subtly pushed out, it may erode their trust in leadership. Team morale can suffer as well, with employees left wondering if they might be treated similarly in the future. This erosion of trust can lead to lower engagement, reduced productivity, and greater turnover.
Long-term effects on company culture
As quiet firing becomes more common, it risks cultivating a toxic workplace culture. Employees may feel that they’re not valued or supported, leading to disengagement and resentment, creating a ripple effect that damages team cohesion and productivity. Over time, such a culture can damage a company’s reputation and make it difficult to attract and retain top talent.
Are you quiet firing? Signs to watch out for as a boss
Several telltale signs may indicate quiet firing. While these actions might sometimes stem from poor management practices, when consistently present, they can point to a pattern of disengagement by leadership, nudging employees toward resignation.
- Limiting communication: A sudden or prolonged decrease in meaningful feedback and updates can leave employees feeling sidelined and uncertain about their standing or growth.
- Withholding development opportunities: When managers consistently avoid assigning challenging projects, deny training sessions, or block access to skill-building experiences, it limits the employee’s ability to advance within the company.
- Neglecting recognition: Employees who feel unrecognized for their contributions may start to question their value to the team, potentially leading to decreased motivation or even resignation.
- Setting ambiguous expectations: Assigning vague or inconsistent goals can create a confusing environment, where employees struggle to understand if they are meeting standards or falling short.
- Conducting unreasonable performance reviews: When employees receive unexpectedly negative or exaggerated performance evaluations without context or constructive feedback, it can be a tactic to encourage them to leave.
- Isolating employees: Excluding individuals from team meetings, projects, or social activities can foster a sense of isolation, pushing them further from the team and eventually out of the company.
How to avoid quiet firing your employees
Avoiding quiet firing as a manager isn’t just about ensuring fair treatment; it’s about creating an environment where employees feel supported, valued, and motivated. Here are essential steps for building a positive workplace culture that will help you retain talent and improve productivity.
Foster open communication
Keeping open and honest communication with your team members goes beyond annual reviews and sporadic feedback. Consider implementing regular one-on-one check-ins where employees can freely discuss their goals, challenges, and any concerns they might have about their roles.
For example, scheduling monthly or bi-weekly feedback sessions can provide employees with a clear understanding of where they stand and give them a chance to discuss any issues. Transparent communication can prevent misunderstandings and ensure that employees know you’re invested in their success. It might also be a good opportunity to hear their opinion about the company.
If an employee’s performance is falling short of expectations, provide constructive feedback and guide them on ways to improve. Instead of simply pointing out the issues, focus on specific strategies they can adopt. Offer resources, whether it’s additional training, mentorship, or a helpful tool, to support their growth. If they don’t improve performance, talk to HR about the next steps (termination or reallocation, for example).
This might help: 5 Ways to Communicate With Your Team That Will Actually Get Results
Set clear expectations
Ambiguity around job responsibilities and performance expectations can lead to frustration and low morale, potentially pushing employees to leave. From the beginning, define each role's core responsibilities and performance metrics in clear, straightforward terms.
For instance, instead of saying, “Increase client engagement,” specify, “Aim to increase client response rates by 20% over the next quarter.” Employees are more likely to succeed and feel valued when they understand exactly what’s expected of them.
Invest in employee development
A common quiet-firing tactic is withholding development opportunities. To counter this, make it a priority to invest in each team member’s growth. Provide access to training programs, mentorships, or leadership workshops that align with both their professional goals and the team’s needs.
For example, if a team member is interested in project management, consider enrolling them in a project management course or pairing them with an experienced project manager for mentorship. These growth opportunities signal that you’re committed to their career trajectory and give them a path for advancement within the organization.
Recognize and reward contributions
Regular recognition can make a tremendous difference in employee morale and engagement. Implement a practice of recognizing both big wins and small achievements. A simple “thank you” during team meetings or a quick email acknowledging good work can reinforce a sense of appreciation.
To go further, you could establish a monthly “spotlight” program where employees nominate and celebrate each other’s efforts. This helps build a culture where recognition is normalized and contributions are celebrated, boosting both individual and team morale.
Encourage team inclusion
Create an inclusive work environment where each employee feels they’re a valued part of the team. Promote team collaboration, involve everyone in key decisions, and encourage team members to share their perspectives openly.
For example, with team projects, make sure responsibilities are shared equally and everyone has the opportunity to contribute meaningfully. Additionally, consider holding brainstorming sessions where every member can provide input and feel like their voice matters. By fostering inclusion, you create a workplace that respects individual contributions and promotes collective success.
Bottom line
Quiet firing may seem like a subtle approach to managing underperformance, but it often creates more issues than it resolves. By fostering clear communication, setting defined expectations, investing in development, recognizing contributions, and promoting inclusion, managers can build a supportive and productive workplace where employees feel valued and motivated.
Proactive management not only helps retain talent but also strengthens team dynamics and preserves a positive company culture. Ultimately, creating an environment that prioritizes open dialogue and growth benefits everyone, reducing turnover and fostering a stronger, more resilient team.
Hey, it never hurts to see what’s out there: Browse 400,000+ open jobs on The Muse—one of them could be your perfect next career move »